Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural reliability approach to analysis of probabilistic seismic hazard and its sensitivities

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new probabilistic framework for seismic hazard assessment and hazard sensitivity analysis. Hazard in this context means the probability of exceeding a measure of ground shaking intensity, such as peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. The main components of the proposed framework include structural reliability methods to estimate exceedance probabilities and their sensitivities, and multiple probabilistic models for earthquake occurrence, magnitude, location, and ground motion. This paper presents two analysis approaches. The first approach utilizes the first- and second-order reliability methods and importance sampling. This approach efficiently yields the hazard exceedance probabilities at a single site. The second approach employs the Monte Carlo sampling reliability method and yields the hazard exceedance probabilities at a multitude of sites in a single analysis, which is suited for large-scale seismic zonation. This paper also presents the probabilistic models that are suited for such analyses with an emphasis on characterization of epistemic uncertainties. Finally, novel sensitivity measures are proposed for hazard sensitivity analysis. These measures provide a framework to identify the most important uncertainties and guide the research to reduce these uncertainties over time. The proposed approach is validated and showcased by an illustrative example. The companion paper presents a comprehensive application to hazard analysis of Iran.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA (2006) Seismic hazard assessment: problems with current practice and future developments. In: First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30:1025–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Cheng Y (2015) Application of a Monte-Carlo simulation approach for the probabilistic assessment of seismic hazard for geographically distributed portfolio. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45:525–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Ay BÖ (2014a) Compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical-to-horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader Europe region. Bull Earthq Eng 12:517–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Ay BÖ (2014b) Erratum to: compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical-to-horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader Europe region. Bull Earthq Eng 12:1429–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnos T, Kiremidjian AS (1988) A review of earthquake occurrence models for seismic hazard analysis. Probab Eng Mech 3:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(88)90002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang AHS, Tang WH (2007) Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, vol 1. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Firuzi E, Etemadsaeed L (2015) Delineation of seismic sources in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis using fuzzy cluster analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:2174–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-05, Reston, VA

  • ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA

  • Assatourians K, Atkinson GM (2013) EqHaz: an open-source probabilistic seismic-hazard code based on the Monte Carlo simulation approach. Seismol Res Lett 84:516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2014) Alternative approaches to modeling epistemic uncertainty in ground motions in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 85:1141–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30:1057–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Tiao GC (1992) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Atik LA et al (2014) NGA-West2 research project. Earthq Spectra 30:973–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA (2012) Empirical correlations between cumulative absolute velocity and amplitude-based ground motion intensity measures. Earthq Spectra 28:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung K (1984) Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals. J Eng Mech 110:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2012) Cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) and seismic intensity based on the PEER-NGA database. Earthq Spectra 28:457–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30:1087–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Akkar S (2016) Probabilistic permanent fault displacement hazard via Monte Carlo simulation and its consideration for the probabilistic risk assessment of buried continuous steel pipelines. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46:605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30:1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen K, Olami Z (1992) Variation of the Gutenberg–Richter b values and nontrivial temporal correlations in a spring-block Model for earthquakes. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 97:8729–8735. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB00427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1967) Bounds on reliability of structural systems. Am Soc Civ Eng Pro J Struct Div 93:171–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90143-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CH, Petersen MD, Reichle MS (1996) A Monte Carlo approach in estimating uncertainty for a seismic hazard assessment of Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange Counties, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1681–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Danciu L, Kale Ö, Akkar S (2018a) The 2014 earthquake model of the middle east: ground motion model and uncertainties. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3497–3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9989-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danciu L, Şeşetyan K, Demircioglu M et al (2018b) The 2014 earthquake model of the middle east: seismogenic sources. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3465–3496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0096-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (2005) First-and second-order reliability methods. In: Nikolaidis E, Ghiocel DM, Singhal S (eds) Engineering design reliability handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A, Ang AHS (1977) A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67:1173–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO (1996) Structural reliability methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Wang G (2013a) A simple ground-motion prediction model for cumulative absolute velocity and model validation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Wang G (2013b) Intra-event spatial correlations for cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity, and spectral accelerations based on regional site conditions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:1117–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebel JE, Kafka AL (1999) A Monte Carlo approach to seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:854–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardini D, Danciu L, Erdik M et al (2018) Seismic hazard map of the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3567–3570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0347-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goda K, Atkinson GM (2009) Probabilistic characterization of spatially correlated response spectra for earthquakes in Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3003–3020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goda K, Hong HP (2008) Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RA, Hall WJ (1994) An overview of selected seismic hazard analysis methodologies. Report No. UILU-ENG-94-2011, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Halchuk S, Allen T, Adams J, Rogers G (2014) Fifth generation seismic hazard model input files as proposed to produce values for the 2015 National Building Code of Canada. Open File 7576, Geological Survey Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada

  • Han S-W, Choi Y-S (2008) Seismic hazard analysis in low and moderate seismic region-Korean peninsula. Struct Saf 30:543–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 100:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R (1988) Improvement of second-order reliability estimates by importance sampling. J Eng Mech 114:2195–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong HP, Goda K, Davenport AG (2006) Seismic hazard analysis: a comparative study. Can J Civ Eng 33:1156–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30:1155–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram N, Baker JW (2009) Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:1687–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Zare M et al (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17:897–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-013-9360-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M, Hien TD, Antúnez H, Kowalczyk P (1997) Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics: theory and finite element computations. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohrangi M, Danciu L, Bazzurro P (2018) Comparison between outcomes of the 2014 Earthquake Hazard Model of the Middle East (EMME14) and national seismic design codes: the case of Iran. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P-L, Der Kiureghian A (1986) Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probab Eng Mech 1:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi AM, Akinci A, Malagnini L, Mueller CS (2005) Uncertainty analysis for seismic hazard in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Geophys 48:853–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M (2012) Probabilistic models, methods, and software for evaluating risk to civil infrastructure. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Mahsuli M, Haukaas T (2013a) Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis. J Comput Civ Eng 27:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M, Haukaas T (2013b) Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods, part I: models. Struct Saf 42:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M, Haukaas T (2013c) Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods, part II: analysis. Struct Saf 42:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M, Haukaas T (2013d) Sensitivity measures for optimal mitigation of risk and reduction of model uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 117:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M, Rahimi H, Bakhshi A (2018) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Iran using reliability methods. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0498-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi W, Taroni M, Selva J (2015) Accounting for epistemic uncertainty in PSHA: logic tree and ensemble modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:2151. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1974) Seismic structural response risk analysis incorporating peak response regressions on earthquake magnitude and distance. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA

  • McGuire RK (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (2008) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: early history. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musson RMW (1999) Determination of design earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis through Monte Carlo simulation. J Earthq Eng 3:463–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Musson RMW (2000) The use of Monte Carlo simulations for seismic hazard assessment in the UK. Ann Di Geofis 43:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Fiessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9:489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H et al (2005) Composite ground-motion models and logic trees: methodology, sensitivities, and uncertainties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:1575–1593. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şeşetyan K, Danciu L, Demircioğlu Tümsa MB et al (2018) The 2014 seismic hazard model of the Middle East: overview and results. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3535–3566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0346-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov V, Wenzel F (2015) On the relation between point-wise and multiple-location probabilistic seismic hazard assessments. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1281–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9661-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov V, Zahran HM, Youssef SE-H et al (2017) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Saudi Arabia using spatially smoothed seismicity and analysis of hazard uncertainty. Bull Earthq Eng 15:2695–2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0075-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Y-K (1990) Structural load modeling and combination for performance and safety evaluation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahran HM, Sokolov V, Youssef SE-H, Alraddadi WW (2015) Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia based on combined areal source model: Monte Carlo approach and sensitivity analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 77:453–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P et al (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalog. J Seismol 18:749–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9444-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Der Kiureghian A (1995) Two improved algorithms for reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1994 6th IFIP WG7.5 working conference on reliability and optimization of structural systems. p 297

Download references

Acknowledgements

Grant No. 96013800 from Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Dr. Jack Baker from Stanford University and Dr. Laurentiu Danciu from Swiss Seismological Service at ETH Zurich for insightful comments that improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Infrastructure Sustainability and Resilience Research, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Hossein Rahimi & Mojtaba Mahsuli

Authors
  1. Hossein Rahimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojtaba Mahsuli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojtaba Mahsuli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahimi, H., Mahsuli, M. Structural reliability approach to analysis of probabilistic seismic hazard and its sensitivities. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 1331–1359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0497-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0497-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation